Monday, 12 October 2015

Knyrik, Bobrov, and "Viking" on the situation in Donbass

October 12, 2015 -
Translated for Fort Russ by J. Arnoldski 



“What next? Konstantin Knyrik, Gleb Bobrov, and “Viking” on the ceasefire, Minsk Agreements, and the future of Ukraine and Donbass”

The Minsk Agreements have recently become the main topics in media as well as everyday kitchen conversation in Novorossiya and Russia. Will Ukraine fulfill them or not? Will the ceasefire last? What future awaits Ukraine and will Donbass return to Ukraine?

Konstantin Knyrik, head of the legendary news agency, News Front:

"If we’re speaking about the prospects of the truce, then three days ago there were serious violations, and the long-suffering Kubyshevsky district of Donetsk was hit by mortar fire from the Ukrainian side. Forecasts do not look optimistic as long as Ukraine is not complying with the truce, sure, not to such an extent as before, but, nevertheless, it is violating it.

The matter at hand is that Ukraine is not completely independent in making its own decisions and when it receives an order to resume hostilities. Information and video confirmation of the constant relocation of Ukrainian equipment to the so-called “ATO” zone are being systematically received.

Concerning Minsk in general, not a single point of the Minsk Agreements wasn’t fulfilled by the DPR and LPR in their deeds. This includes moving elections and giving a last chance to Ukraine to listen to the Normandy Format and fulfill them. 

But I don’t think that Ukraine will fulfill them, because the government in Ukraine now needs war, and war is the only instrument for maintaining the authorities. The people came [to power] by blood. And only blood can keep them in power.

I would like to be an optimist and believe in peace. Today, the republics are being built amidst the realities of war. They are building their statehood and doing this quite successfully. There are some kinds of welfare payments, the heating season has started, there are new factories, and there are new market outlets in the Russian Federation. Not long ago, the Lugansk meat-packing plant received approval to export meat products to Russia.

Only time will show how events develop further, but it is a fact that Ukraine can resume hostilities again in any moment. They are preparing for this, because they have no other path than war."

Gleb Bobrov, chairman of the LPR Writers’ Union, legendary author of “The Era of the Stillborn”, in which he foretold current events and the war in Ukraine and Donbass 10 years ago:

"Unfortunately, Ukraine is not going to fulfill any agreements. Instead of fulfilling them, they come up with all sorts of interpretations, artificial events, provocations, and so on. What Poroshenko said in Paris in the presence of Putin, Merkel, and Hollande is no more than a bluff. No one is going to fulfill anything. 

The problem is that the fulfilling of the Minsk Agreements is impossible for one reason: of Ukraine fulfills them, then it will cease to be Ukraine. The agreement assumes that a single, unitary Ukraine will simply cease to exist and turn in to a confederation.

If Donbass at first wanted to be heard, wanted mild autonomy in regards to our worldview, culture, history, and just basic respect, then now Donbass will not go for anything less than a confederation.

Ukrainie itself cannot change. After three major Ukrainian military defeats, taking into account losses of 15-20,000 dead, 35-50,000 crippled and maimed people with disabilities, the territorial losses of Crimea and Donbass, and a destroyed economy, the questions: for what sake is all of this? The current Ukrainian leadership still hasn’t been asked this question, and not simply asked, but demanded to find those at fault. And then someone will have to be hanged from lampposts. 

Now there is a real checkmate. Any further action will lead only to a deterioration of the situation. Therefore, the Ukrainian leadership is simply stalling according to an old Ukrainian tradition: “So be it.”

Today, they are increasingly robbing and ripping the last shreds of wool from a half-dead sheep, stuffing their pockets. Not even us, but the Ukrainian “hundreds” themselves say that they’ve never seen such corruption before. They are selling everything, even fake bulletproof vests. You see, it’s already come to the point of selling “Grad” systems. Just imagine: they wanted to sell a “Grad” from Western Ukraine to Romania. And what is there to say about little things like guns - we have the UAF fighters who went around Bolshaya Vergunka, selling them for 700 hrivnya. And this still isn’t the end. I think the situation will only worsen. 

In a year and a half, they’ve brought the country to default, the level of external debt has reached $70 billion, and Yatsenyuk goest up to the podium of the Verkhovna Rada says that they’ve prepared for winter: they intercepted a billion here, three billion there - is this such a normal preparation? 

They all have an absolutely childish attitude. Apparently, they believe that after everything they will have time to run to the border. 

Not long ago, we completed a sociological survey, in which we managed to talk with 28 people from the Ukrainian side of Lugansk, with those who didn’t recognize the Russian Spring or the LPR, but are still people. Read it, you won’t regret it. So here they are, on the other side, who consider us to be separatists, and they openly say that yes, we have an economic and humanitarian catastrophe,. Yes, we have complete lawlessness and arbitrariness, and as a norm they don’t know what will happen next. 

You know, I recently spoke with the famous writer Herman Sadulaev and asked him how the Chechens and Russians were able to overcome the consequences of the war. Three things turned out to be: the will of the people, which didn’t want war, sande leaders in the form of Putin and Akhmat, and later his son Ramzan Kadyrov, and the economic component. And that’s it - the terrible conflict was overcome. 

Now show me at least one sane politician from the other side? There is silence on this point. Is there simply at least one sane person with whom we could speak? Here’s the very “fulfillment” of the Minsk Agreements and all." 

Active participant of “Russian Spring” in Donetsk, militia commander Aleksandr Matyushin, call-sign “Viking”:

"A more or less silent regime has been established at the front. Again, it is a relative silence, as we see that Ukrainian troops continue to periodically violate the ceasefire. 

In particular, the day before yesterday the UAF struck the Kiev district of Donetsk with 120mm mortars. Almost immediately they renounce what they’ve done, and Ukrainian media announces that it was the DPR who attacked, and they say at state assemblies that the “militants” have destroyed their notorious commanders, “Givi” and “Motorola.” I will immediately say that this is a lie. 

Ukrainian troops not only didn’t remove their weapons, but they also continue to enlarge troop groupings in main areas. For all those who say “they ditched us”, I will say at once that we also aren’t in too much of a hurry to remove our armor and weapons, despite all the loud statements of Denis Pushilin in Minsk. Already now, judging by the concentration of enemy forces, it is possible to say that peaceful plans envisaged. 

Thus you can guess the approximate scenarios of a development of hostilities if the Kiev government decides on a full-scale war. The concentration of forces and political statements say that Kiev is deciding to repeat the scenario of the Croatians against Republika Srpska Krajina and the UAF will act in the same way. They are waiting until all heavy and not-so heavy weapons will be allotted to the rear under the supervision of various peacekeeping missions (like the OSCE). On one fine day (probably in autumn when the mud dries, o r maybe in winter, as who knows what goes on in the minds of the descendants of great Ukros), an offensive will be started on three fronts with artillery support. 

Now it’s already possible to discern that a southern offensive will come from the town of Volnovakha, and a strike will come from Kurakhovo via Marinka against Donetsk (western direction), and respectively from the north in the direction of Gorlovka. 

Given that Ukrainian pilots are afraid of our defenses, they are now learning to fly at very low altitudes, and I do not exclude the use of aircraft by the UAF. Also not excluded are fights on secondary fronts, such as the Donetsk airport or the recent one repulsed by us at Debaltsevo, in order to divert our attention and additional reserves which could be thrown at preventing a breakthrough by Ukrainian troops.

This scenario isn’t the only likely one - it is one of the possible scenarios which was voiced by some Ukrainian military men and politicians (in particular Mr. Parubiy spoke about the repetition of the Serbian scenario). But knowing our officers, I think that they already long ago reviewed this scenario and I think (and I know many officers personally, and they are far from stupid people) that in case of all sorts of “unexpected surprises,” they have a few surprises which could shock Ukrainian soldiers. 


What should the civilians of DPR do? Enjoy the last sunny and peaceful days..."

Fact vs. Fiction: Texas on the Dutch MH17 Coverup

October 12th, 2015 - 

by: Russel "Texas" Bentley - Fort Russ - 

Texas is an American volunteer fighting against US-supported Ukrainian fascists, and for the independence of Novorossiya - 



The Dutch cover up report on MH17 comes out on Monday. Of course, I have not read the final draft yet, because the contents are secret, but I know bullshit when I smell it, and I can smell it all the way from Amsterdam. I do not have to read it to know it is a lie. But I will, and it will be. How can I be so sure? 


Because I know what happened, I have been told by an eyewitness. But even before that, all the circumstantial evidence really puts the answer beyond any reasonable doubt. And when the Dutch publish their lies on Monday, I expect the Russians will reply with the truth, and with their proof. In the meantime, let's consider what we already know...

There are already far too many discrepancies for any serious person to give the Dutch "report" any credence, regardless of what it says. If this report was not a cover up, if it actually was concerned with the truth, instead of just being a cover up of an obvious false flag, it would have come out at least a year ago, rather than 16 months after the fact. Why do you think it took so long?



False flags are used by fascist warmongers the way a carpenter uses a hammer. It is one of their primary tools: Gulf of Tonkin, 9/11, Iraqi WMD's, Syrian sarin, MH17... You don't have to be a genius to see the pattern here. And many people do. Gone are the days when eyewitnesses in Dealy Plaza or Lower Manhattan will say "I thought I knew what I saw, but after reading the government report, I guess I was wrong." 

The Fascists have learned from their past mistakes. The world is much more informed and aware than it was in November '63 or September 2001. So this time, they take their time to craft their lies carefully, to try and avoid another "magic bullet" or WTC 7. But a lie is still a lie, and the truth will out. Many people around the world are waking up and refusing to believe the lies, and I am sure it will be the same with the MH17 report. But this time, let's do something about it.



How can I be sure the report will be a lie if I haven't read it yet? Well, for one thing, the authors of the report have been lying all along, with their leaks and comments and misleading innuendo. This article is an excellent example of what I mean. But even without all these documented falsehoods by the authors, you don't have to be Sherlock Holmes to draw an accurate and obvious conclusion from the circumstances. Let's do our own investigation of the publicly acknowledged historical facts...

First, always ask "Cui bono", who benefits?  Certainly not the Russians or the Novorussians. Is it really possible to believe that either would shoot down a civilian airliner on purpose or by accident? On purpose, not possible.It would be suicidal for them, as well as criminally insane to do so. By accident? Do you really think soldiers trained on a sophisticated weapons system like the BUK could not tell the difference between the radar signature of a civilian airliner and a military jet fighter? No, whoever shot MH17 down, knew it was a civilian airliner, and targeted it on purpose, but there are many reasons to doubt it was even shot down by a BUK.



The photographs of the fuselage of MH17's cockpit are all you really need to see. The perfectly round  30 mm holes can be seen in photos on Google Images . Or listen to what Canadian citizen and OSCE monitor Michael Bociurkiw said, just a few days after the event. Russian military radar detected at least one SU-25 in close proximity to MH17 just before the crash, consistent with eyewitness accounts from people on the ground at the time, including DNP Prime Minister Alexander Zaharshenko (6:14) 

Interestingly, the Wikipedia and other information sources about SU-25 flight capabilities were edited and changed before July 17th, to reduce the flight ceiling from 10,000 meters to 7,000 meters. The SU-25 CAN fly at 10,000 meters, (10:50) the height that MH17 was at when it was attacked. The SU-25 is armed with two 30 mm cannons. The Ukrainian Air Force has Su-25's. The DNR does not.




But beyond all the evidence out there for anyone who wants to find it, just ask yourself the obvious questions - why did Yatsenyuk resign less than a week later, only to be ordered to return. Why did it take 16 months for the report to come out, why does the US release meticulous satellite images of Russian forces in Syria, but releases none from Ukraine, when it is a known fact that the US had a satellite over Ukraine when MH17 was shot down? What ever happened to the air traffic control tapes from Kiev ATC, or the air traffic controller Carlos from Spain who tweeted about Ukrainian SBU agents confiscating the tapes minutes after MH17 went down? If the Dutch report does not include US satellite images, info from the Black Boxes (that the DNR turned over to investigators days after they were found), the Kiev ATC tapes, and the info about the metal fragments found in the autopsies of the victims, it is total bullshit. Which is what I expect.



I went to the MH17 crash site a few days ago. I visited two memorials for the 298 victims who were murdered in the skies above Novorussia. Two places where human bodies fell like rain. Innocent men, women, and 80 innocent children, sacrificed by genuine Evil, to perpetuate a lie. As I stood there, I thought to myself that I had never been to the site of a mas murder before, and then it occurred to me that indeed I had. 

When I was in the US Army, stationed in Germany over 30 years ago, I went to Dachau concentration camp, outside Munich. I did not want to go, but I felt a moral obligation to do so, to look true Evil in the face, to see its work, and I did the same outside Torrez last week, again. And before I went to Torrez, I wondered what kind of person could pull the trigger, sending 298 innocent human beings to their deaths, and standing there at the memorial in GOLOBO, I knew. 

Those that did this are the same as those who filled the ovens at Dachau, and who burned men, women and children to death on Odessa. Those that can say killing half a million children was "Worth it", those who can use the words "infinitely easy" and "kill a million people" in the same sentence. Nazis. You know who did this, and so do I. And I understood that those who did this, and those who ordered it to be done, are not human, they are monsters. As are their Dutch lying lackeys who will try to cover up this crime on Monday, October 13th, 2015.

I have been to Amsterdam many times, and have flown out of Schiphol Airport more than once myself. The people who boarded Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17 on that terrible day back in 2014 did not think the war in Donbass could ever effect them. It did. Those of us still here must take a lesson from them. 

Or we too will suffer their fate. There is a war going on, all over the world, right now, today. This war is between Humanity and those who want to exterminate most of us and enslave the rest. Donbass and Syria are the front lines, and what happens in these places will determine the future for us all. Remember that, and think, and engage, with your heart and with your mind. 

We are all in this together, and the day of reckoning is near. Forego the comforting lie and face the hard truth. The future of Humanity depends upon your doing so.


Erdoğan sheds light on Syria ... a blue flame

"Assad, refusing the transit of Qatari gas and becoming a potential competitor in the European market, would have to be be eliminated."

Analysis by Ronald ZONCA
in Boulevard Voltaire October 11, 2015

October 12, 2015
Translated from French by Tom Winter
In a recent statement following the Russian air raids, President Erdoğan threatened to end all gas-line cooperation with Russia , adding that Turkey might consider other sources. Since the other source is Qatar, Erdogan's statement brings us to the real origins of the destabilization of Syria.

Syria suffers a double whammy in our world which is made up of the pillaging of the poorest. Not only has it discovered a large gas field along its coast but, in addition, its location made it the natural host for pipelines to supply Europe.

Assad, refusing the transit of Qatari gas and becoming a potential competitor in the European market, would have to be be eliminated. Physically, according to Fabius; at least politically, according to Western leaders.

Faced with such insubordination, Messrs Sarkozy and Juppé, then president and foreign minister, were quick to show him their disenchantment. From 2012, the break was consummated, despite the previous outbursts of affection shown in those parades on the Champs Elysees.

The interests of the United States and Qatar are a priority for our diplomacy, no matter what the consequences for France and Europe. Messrs Hollande and Fabius have only walked in the footsteps of their predecessors.

The Russian intervention in Syria has caused surprise in the Western camp by its speed and efficiency. Further, it gives rise to a serious problem for the Turkish president. The progress of the Syrian army from west to east will result in movement of troops of the Islamic State. They can not go to Iran and Kurdistan because of the military power of Iran and Kurdistan. As for Iraq, its leaders are beginning to take the lead in pondering a possible Russian intervention for them, too. This doesn't leave anybody but Turkey to host the monster created by the Westerners.

In the face of the level of barbarism and the potential damage posed by these fighters, Erdoğan's worry is justified. This explains why he would rather have the troops of the Islamic State stay in Syria and not in Turkey. 

Consequently, there remain just two solutions for Turkey: to participate in the destruction of the Islamic state in Syria, thus violating the instructions of the USA, or let an army of terrorists wash over Europe.

Resisting the greed of the West, the Syrian president could not have imagined they would be crazy enough to create the Islamic state without measuring the consequences for the region and for Europe.

We can appreciate his leadership of the Syrian nation in different ways, but he showed respect for the job of a president in defending the wealth of his country.
Unlike our elites, Assad can not be accused of having sold his country to foreign powers.

Thursday, 20 August 2015

Russian Strategy in the Arctic


August 20, 2015

Marat Ramazanov


Translated for Fort Russ by the Soviet Bear


[PolitRussia is the first Russian analytical resource which accompanies its articles with short youtube version for a wider reach in social media]




Our country has consistently increased its influence in the Arctic int he recent times. The importance of this region is due to several factors. There are rich reserves of oil and gas on the continental shelf of the Arctic. It is important to control the region so our shores are safe from the navy of some country, very intrusive in terms of 'democratic values'. Not to forget our other strategic project related to the Arctic region — the Northern Sea route.

Russia has a right to a significant portion of the Arctic. And this right is based on the results of scientific research expeditions. For example, in 2007, our scientists studying the soil near the North pole, proved that the Lomonosov ridge is a continuation of the Siberian continental platform.

In addition to coastal areas, islands and waters, which are most relevant to Russia, there are places in the far North where our country also plays a role, such as Svalbard [Spitsbergen archipelago]

Geographically, the islands belong to Norway, but, according to the "Treaty of 1920", Russia has the right to carry out scientific research and commercial activities on the islands and in the adjacent territorial waters on equal terms with Norway. By the way, the second largest settlement on Svalbard — Barentsburg, is located in the Russian jurisdiction. There are the "Arktikugol" [meaning "Arctic Coal"] company, the Orthodox Church and, possibly, the northernmost statue of Lenin.



This year Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin visited Barentsburg, which caused great dissatisfaction on the part of the leadership of Norway. The Scandinavians have even decided to restrict access to the archipelago for persons who are on the sanctions list of the European Union. What does Norway has to do with the EU is unclear, but the unanimity of the Western States in their negative attitude towards Russia is not surprising. By the way, the Norwegian decision contradicts the above Spitsbergen treaty. Our foreign ministry expressed protest. If the Norwegians decide to send military units to the territory of Spitsbergen, which is part of our country, it would be the de facto breach of the treaty and, probably, Russia will react differently.


Barentsburg


Military presence as a reliable argument

In order to be able to respond not only in vocal protest, we need to have some serious basis. For example, we should strengthen military capabilities in the Arctic, which is what Russia has recently been doing. The landing of paratroopers on ice has become a matter of habit. In 2015 paratroopers from Belarus and Tajikistan joined in the exercises in the harsh Northern conditions.

But we should not stop there. It is necessary to build new military ports. Yes, we need to upgrade the ones we already have. On the shores of the Arctic ocean we have ports (military and civilian) — Dixon, Pevek, Tiksi. They should be developed first of all.

It is important to constantly ensure that our country has the most advanced military equipment and weapons for use at extremely low temperatures. Fortunately, in recent times we have been doing fine in this regard. It would be nice for civil vehicles to be suitable for Arctic conditions too. Here, for example, UAZ "Patriot" was made suitable for use in the Arctic.


The importance of International law

Once our military superiority in the Arctic is ensured, we can proceed to the development of the region as a whole. The Federation Council has already prepared the concept of the law on development of the Arctic. To make other countries refrain from encroaching on the Russian Arctic, it is necessary to secure our right to it with international documents. In August this year, Russia has re-filed an application to the UN for the extension of the domain in the Arctic by the addition of the Lomonosov ridge and other areas of the shelf, which is a continuation of the mainland. Our first attempt to secure the Arctic areas for ourselves in international law was more than a dozen years ago. Then the bid also included the sea of Okhotsk. After the failure of our diplomats we decided to obtain the rights to these territories one by one. Let me remind you that the sea of Okhotsk was recognized exclusively Russian in 2014, Now is the turn of the Arctic.

Integrated control system of the Arctic

Speaking about the Arctic, it is worth mentioning the emerging integrated system of control of the region, which should appear before 2025. The system will include civil and military segments. Thanks to its operation, Russian military and civilian agencies will be always aware of developments in the Arctic region, and will be able to instantly react to any changes of interest or danger to our country.

Why is the control system being created so quickly? We have already answered this question: the Arctic is a region rich in hydrocarbons and of interest to many influential powers. Russia has to gain a foothold on the territory in the near future, because after 10 years the need for hydrocarbons in the world will grow. And only powerful military capabilities can discourage the “luminaries of democracy" to dictate terms in the Russian Arctic.

The oligarchs are cooking a "Tariff Maidan"



August 20, 2015

Vladimir Raichenko


Translated for Fort Russ by J. Arnoldski



Deputy of the Verkhovna Rada and member of the parliamentary faction "Bloc of Petro Poroshenko", Sergey Kaplin, has called Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk an “enemy of the people” and “mafiozi” and has called for a new Maidan against the executive authorities.

The information bulletins of the "Party of Ordinary People” recently established and headed by Kaplin, with the above-mentioned claims, was distributed on the streets of Kiev, a correspondent of “PolitNavigator” reports.

Photographs of thousands rallying on the main square in Kiev adorn the front page with the inscription: “We’ll start a Maidan against the "Yatsenyuk tariffs.”

“Enough with the talk about 'Yatsenyuk’s tariffs’ from the talk-show podium. He doesn’t care to hear us. Only a "Tariff Maidan" will stop the Prime Minister, a key role in which must be played by the people of Kiev,” - the leader of the newly-fledged party, who once hacked to pieces with an axe the door to the office of the mayor of Poltava, explained in the pages of the newspaper.

Thus far, Kaplin’s rhetoric has only become harsher and more radical.

“Together with ordinary Ukrainians I will go by foot through the towns and villages,” he promised, “We will build a real Maidan against the tariffs of Yatsenyuk, we will demand his resignation, and, if necessary, re-elections to the Verkhovna Rada. We will not forgive betrayal. There is no place for enemies of the Ukrainian people in parliament and government.”

Kaplin promises to mercilessly fight not only the high tariffs, but also corruption and the oligarchs, although he avoids direct criticism of the oligarch whose parliamentary fraction he’s a part of: Poroshenko. 


DSC_0258.JPG


To the question of how to achieve all of this, he replies: 

“I have three answers for this question. Maidan, Maidan, and Maidan again.”

Besides Yatsenyuk himself, his close circle is also attacked in a collage with the caption: “Yatsenyuk’s mafia didn’t let us choose.” Besides Yatsenyuk, Oleksandr Turchynov, Arsen Avakov, and Sergey Pashinski are discerned.

DSC_0275.JPG

In the conclusion the bulletin of the the party said: "We are going to the polls in the city council."

DSC_0273.JPG

According to the information of “PolitNavigator,” the oligarchical group of Firtash-Levochkin is the sponsor of colorful politician which in competing with Yatsenyuk camp and is believed to be involved in organizing the initial stage of a Maidan 2.0. Sergey Kaplin ended up in the Bloc of Petro Poroshenko as part of an agreement with Klichko’s UDAR, financial aid to whom was also provided by Firtash and which the oligarch Firtash revealed under oath in Austrian court.

Earlier, Sergei Caplin issued an ultimatum to the West, threatening that Ukraine will start producing nuclear weapons, if it doesn't receive effective assistance from the US and the EU.

The Russian/Chechen trail from Maidan to the ATO



August 20, 2015

Alexey Zotyev


Translated for Fort Russ by J. Arnoldski



The fact that mercenaries are fighting in the ranks of the Ukrainian army and in units under the control of the Ministry of the Interior is something that has been widely reported. Neo-nazis and radicals of all kind, seeking adventure and easy money, flocked to the Ukrainian side once the fratricidal conflict broke out in the country. Some are fighting for money, which was abundantly poured into the UAF budget by the American government, and some are fighting for an idea. But what is the idea in a fratricidal civil war?

Russia did not remain on the sidelines. Almost immediately, as soon as the volunteers from Russia flocked to Novorossia to help local militia, appeared another stream, less bustling, but no less stable. Ranks of radical nationalists and other public, including the representatives of openly criminal organizations, flocked from Russia to Ukraine. At first, they covered their faces and avoided the camera lens, but soon, believing in their "unique mission" began to give interviews in which they shared their revelations about the motives that led them to the side of the Ukrainian security services.

Most of those who agreed to speak on camera said that they went to the ATO to fight against the criminal Russian regime which had unleashed a fratricidal war in Ukraine. Accordingly, none of them mentioned the generous funding of the National Guard battalions joined by the Russian citizens, most of whom are wanted in their country, and that the war in Donbass was started by Poroshenko.

Well alright, let them believe what they want, it's easier. Easier to kill. But there is one more thing which they preferred not to voice: many of them went to Ukraine long before the civil war broke out in the country. Mercenaries from all over the world played a significant role in the organization of Maidan in 2013 and the subsequent coup. They were the force that spilled the first blood in Kiev. Then they joined the ranks of territorial battalions and continued their "struggle for an idea" already in Donbass, killing civilians and destroying the peaceful cities.

This document, which has not yet been freely released, features a Russian citizen born in the Chechen republic, Ruslan Arsaev, with the call sign “Chechen,” who is a fighter of the “Aidar” battalion (V0624). This document didn’t appear by chance. With fighters of “Aidar,” Arsaev presented themselves as fighters of a counterintelligence battalion. It is indicated that this citizen of Russia did indeed participate in the ATO in contingent V0624, but there is no counterintelligence battalion there. In principle, the presence or absence of counterintelligence in the battalion "Aidar" is of little interest to us. The other information is important: Arsaev, according to this document, actively participated in the confrontations on the Maidan in 2013-2014. He took part not alone, but as part of a group of others who were “visiting Ukrainian patriots" like himself. Now it becomes clear who is the main driving force "of the Ukrainian national revolution."

Arsaev himself, who not long ago was the pride of the Maidan and a hero of the ATO, was arrested on the territory of the Schastye settlement in Lugansk region on April 20, 2015. The fake counterintelligence agent was charged with the creation of bandit groups with all the implications - robbery, looting, and participation in anti-state protests. This “hero of Ukraine” is now doing his time, but how many more such people are fighting in the ranks of the UAF or the National Guard? Are they fighting and killing for the glory of Ukraine?








Source: Poroshenko is planning an operation to destroy DPR and LPR with NATO support


August 20, 2015


Translated for Fort Russ by J. Arnoldski


According to a source in the general staff of the UAF, at the meeting of Hollande, Merkel and Poroshenko, the latter will seek approval to conduct a military operation to destroy the DPR and LPR.

The scenario as follows: 

At Poroshenko’s request and in view of a Russian aggression (after a false flag with chemical weapons or depleted uranium, etc.), Germany and France will agree to deploy a “peacekeeping” mission on the territory of Ukraine (the DPR and LPR being Ukrainian territory).

Under the pretext of parachuting NATO units with armored vehicles as part of a training exercises, they will plant a tactical group of paratroopers in the border region with Russia (presumably the regions of Krasnodon, Dolzhansky, Uspenka, Novoazovsk in order to contain the passages) with simultaneous strikes by UAF units from Mariupol:

  • from Granitnoe and Novognatovka-Elenvoka they’ll strike Starobeshevo with deployment to the North and South
  • from Avdeevka-Krasnogorovka to Makeevka and Khartsizsk with cutting off Gorlovka 
  • Svetlodarsk to Shakhtersk, Snezhnoe, Krasny Luch
  • from Krymsky to Lutugino and Stanichno-Luganskoe to Sukhodolsk and Krasnodon

Tank wedges will split the NAF defense, blocking the cities and metropolitan areas which will be swept by a second echelon.

The armed forces of the Russian Federation will not intervene, since a direct clash with NATO units would lead to a war under very disadvantageous conditions for Russia.

The sweep of metropolitan areas will be conducted as in the Yugoslav scenario without contact by massive air and artillery strikes.

The only constraining factor is concern over direct contact with the armed forces of the Russian Federation since the level of training of individual units (from privates to commanders of tactical battalion groups) and motivation is much higher than in the majority of NATO units. The level of strategic thinking of the high command of the armed forces of the Russian Federation is very highly appraised.