Showing posts with label History. Show all posts
Showing posts with label History. Show all posts

Thursday, 26 May 2016

Do You Want Me to Buy a Mirror for You, "Democratic" Gentlemen? - Alexander Rogers

Translated by Ollie Richardson for Fort Russ
27th May, 2016



I'm so fed up of this hypocritical whining by the West and its puppets about the poor Poles who were separated as a result of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.

Well, firstly, there was no "Pact". It was a "Treaty". A non-aggression Treaty.

Secondly, this Treaty was preceded by some other "covenants".

To begin with, who signed a Treaty with Hitler and Mussolini long before Stalin? Oh, all of a sudden! 30 September 1938 the so-called Munich agreement was signed, under which Britain and France gave the Third Reich the Sudetenland of Czechoslovakia. The representatives of the Soviet Union, by the way, were denied participation in the negotiations.

"The Pact" about flushing the Sudetenland of Czechoslovakia to the Nazis was signed by Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, French Prime Minister Edouard Daladier, Germany's Chancellor Adolf Hitler, and Prime Minister of Italy Benito Mussolini.

Two years ago, in 2014, "the non-aggression Pact" between Yanukovych and the Maidan opposition was signed by the Ministers of France and Germany. Analogies and parallels do not rise?

In fact, here is a photo of the whole party, impossible to deny (from left to right as listed above).



But back to history. In the spring of 1939, Czechoslovakia was invaded by Nazi troops. The Soviet Union, which Czechoslovakia had a mutual assistance agreement with, was ready to intervene and request from Poland a corridor for the Soviet troops to defend Czechoslovakia from the Nazis.

By the way, of all participating countries of the League of Nations, only the Soviet Union tried in March of 1938 to protest against the annexation of Austria, but the UK again suddenly lashed out against Soviet efforts.

And it was specifically the Soviet representative who stated at the Plenum of the Council of the League of Nations on the need for urgent action in support of Czechoslovakia, and also expressed their demands to consider in the League of Nations the question of German aggression. This was ignored by Britain and France (remind us of anything?).

Moreover, the Soviet government made a statement to the Polish government that any attempt of the latter to occupy a part of Czechoslovakia automatically cancels the non-aggression Treaty between the USSR and Poland.

And then Poland refused the Soviet Union the right of passage for the Soviet army. So much so, that the Polish Ambassador in Paris, Lukasiewicz, assured the US Ambassador to France - Bullitt - that Poland would immediately declare war on the USSR if she tries to send troops through Polish territory to aid Czechoslovakia, and if Soviet planes appear over Poland on the way into Czechoslovakia, they will immediately be attacked by Polish aviation.

Instead of helping the Czechs, Poland invaded Czechoslovakia and captured the Cieszyn region (the Soviet Union then had all rights to declare war on Poland). In fact, Poland divided Czechoslovakia with the Third Reich, in what was a preliminary agreement between the Polish Foreign Minister Jozef Beck and Foreign Minister of the Third Reich - the notorious Ribbentrop.

The so-called "Covenant of Beck-Ribbentrop Pact". What happened? Pilsudski is worse than Hitler?

Here he is, by the way, together with Goebbels.



And in the third photo, there is Polish Minister Beck. Oh, who is he with? Is it Adolf? Can't be! This is a photoshop! The Kremlin's propaganda!


So what is it, citizens? Is the head of Poland Mościcki is the same as Hitler? Is the British Prime Minister Chamberlain the same as Hitler? Is Prime Minister of France the same as Hitler? Or all of them are even worse than Hitler, as liberals broadcast to us about Stalin (Poland, too, by the way, had their own concentration camps, for example in Bereza Kartuska)?

Isn't it Horace Wilson - the adviser to the British Prime Minister - who said that "Germany and England are the two pillars that support the world order against the destructive pressure of Bolshevism"? And they and Hitler were kissing each other on the lips? And with smooching!

It turns out that capitalist ideology (liberal, democratic, whatever) is equal to Nazism? You need to strongly condemn the British monarchy for cooperating with the Nazis? Where are the democratic public looking? It's time to hold the damned hypocrites accountable for concluding the contract with Hitler!

Do you want me to buy a mirror for you, "Democratic" gentlemen?

P.S. I must admit that in this situation Winston Churchill, who specifically on this occasion said "England was offered a choice between war and dishonor. She chose dishonor and will got war", looks dignified.


     Follow us on Facebook!                                                  
              Facebook                                   

       Follow us on Twitter!
              Twitter               

             Donate!

Tuesday, 12 April 2016

No Ukrainian Language in 1911 British Encyclopaedia, but There Is the Little Russian Dialect

Translated by Ollie Richardson for Fort Russ
12th April, 2016




Taken from zhenziyou [Another Livejournal blogger - O.R.] in "Ukrainian dialect of the Russian language and the New Russia - Encyclopaedia Britannica 1911, New York, USA"

"The Russian dialects are divided into two main groups - large (Velikorusskij), including White (Belorusskij) Russian language and Little Russian (Malorusskij). The latter is spoken in a belt reaching from Galicia and the Northern Carpathians (see Ruthenians) through Podolia and Volhynia and the governments of Kiev, Chernigov, Poltava, Kharkov and the southern part of Voronezh to the Don and the Kuban, upon which Dnepr Cossacks were settled. To the south of this belt in "New Russia" the population is very mixed, but Little Russians on the whole predominate. In all there must be about 30,000,000 Little Russians."



PS. In the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica the following was written:

"The Little Russian dialect claims to be a literary language; it has established this claim in Galicia (see Ruthenians), but its use as such is much restricted in Russia. The Little Russians differ from the Great Russians not only in language but in physical type, customs, domestic architecture and folk-lore; but though Russophobes have tried to prove that this is due to the Finnish element in the Great Russians, it cannot be substantiated, and the Little Russians, especially the descendants of the Cossacks, have no small Tatar element in them. For the last three centuries they have been under strong Polish influence, and this has had great effect upon the vocabulary but not much on phonetics or morphology..."



     Follow us on Facebook!                                                  
              Facebook                                   

       Follow us on Twitter!
              Twitter               

             Donate!

Sunday, 10 April 2016

The Road to Western Armenia Begins in Artsakh

April 10th, 2016 ~ Fort Russ News ~ 

 By: Arevordi, edited by J. Flores ~ 



Artsakh today plays a major role in Eurasia's Great Game. Artsakh's existence as an unrecognized military fortress serves the geostrategic interests of the Kremlin. While the unresolved dispute over Artsakh ensures Armenia's political dependence on Moscow, Artsakh has also been the Russian sledgehammer hanging over Turkish heads, the sharp sickle that in one swoop can sever one of the strategic energy lifelines of the West. 

Simply put, Artsakh ensures Armenia's dependence on Moscow and Azerbaijan's fear of Moscow. As a result, strategic planners in Moscow will not tolerate any military misadventures by Baku. Fearing, however, that Baku may be under intense pressure to resolve its problems militarily, Moscow has been strengthening its military presence throughout the north Caucasus, as well as those located in Armenia.

Armenians of Artsakh are the only major group within the Armenian nation that were not fully subjugated by any power at any time in history, they are the direct genetic decedents of our ancient warrior-aristocracy class. In other words: Armenians of Artsakh carry within their genetic code the traits of our valiant ancient ancestors. It is therefore fully understandable why a vast majority of the greatest Armenian military men in modern times were derived from the general vicinity of Artsakh. 

This fact alone speaks volumes about the paramount importance of pedigree. While the rest of the Armenian nation was deprived of its warrior and aristocratic classes and systematically reduced to existing as subservient peasants, artisans and petty merchants during the course of the past one thousand years, Armenians of Artsakh were able to preserve our people's ancient characteristics: Resourceful, courageous, disciplined, resilient, stubborn, intelligent, patriotic and warlike. Needless to say, Azeris found all this out the hard way during the 1990's. The land of Artsakh reminded all Armenians that Armenia's enemy has always been and continues to be the Turk. The land of Artsakh showed us all that the only way forward is through armed struggle. 

The land of Artsakh also gave us all a real lesson in genuine patriotism and realpolitik. In a certain sense, Artsakh saved Armenia and the Diaspora, not the other way around.

If Western Armenia is to get liberated someday, it will only come by way of a Russian-Armenian force once again marching westward from the south Caucasus. The road to Western Armenia therefore starts in Eastern Armenia and the keys to Western Armenia are thus found in the Kremlin. We have been dreaming about the liberation of Western Armenia for decades. All of a sudden, it feels as if that dream can become a reality. Are we ready? Are we as a people ready to play a role if Russia does go to war against Turkey? 


The Russian army's lightning advance into the Armenian Highlands during the Caucasus Campaign of the First World War showed Armenians that the liberation of Western Armenia is a possibility, given that it is done under the right circumstances. The heroic campaign one hundred years ago encouraged us to prepare, at least mentally, for the next historic opportunity. That historic opportunity may have already come. What Ankara did on November 24th (2015) was an act of war and it may yet prove to be its death knell.

     Follow us on Facebook!                                                  
              Facebook                                   

       Follow us on Twitter!
              Twitter               

             Donate!

Friday, 8 April 2016

U.S Prepared Hitler for War With the USSR (Part 21)

Translated by Ollie Richardson for Fort Russ
8th April, 2016



Part 1 Part 2  / Part 3  / Part 4 / Part 5 / Part 6 / Part 7 / Part 8 Part 9 / Part 10 / Part 11 / Part 12 / Part 13 / Part 14 / Part 15 / Part 16 / Part 17 / Part 18 / Part 19 / Part 20

The website of the TV channel "Tvzvezda" has published a series of articles on the great Patriotic war of 1941-1945 by writer Leonid Maslovsky, based on his book "Russkaya Pravda", published in 2011.

In his opinion articles, Maslovsky reveals "the myths of the imaginary foe, Russia, and the events of the great Patriotic war, showing the greatness of our Victory." The author notes that in his articles he is going to "show the US' unhelpful role in West Germany's preparations for war with the USSR".


Kharkiv slaughter: How "brilliant leader" Khrushchev killed thousands of soldiers

The balance of forces on the Soviet-German front by May 1942 was as follows: the Red Army had 5.1 million people (without air defense forces and the Navy), almost 3,900 tanks, 44,900 guns and mortars, and about 2,200 combat aircraft.

The Nazi army had 6.2 million people, 3,229 tanks and assault guns, 57,000 guns and mortars, and 3395 combat aircraft. Please note: Germany and allies had 1.1 million more soldiers and officers compared to our ground forces. The superiority in the number of German & ally troops remained from the first day of the war until 1943.

But already in the summer of 1943 the number of troops of the Red Army exceeded the number of German troops by 1.8 million people. And some people say that the armies of the USSR lost more troops than Germany and its allies!


In the summer of 1942, Germany had superior guns and aircraft. We had a slight superiority in tanks, but light tanks still constituted a large proportion of our units.

The largest grouping of German troops (more than 70 divisions) was in the Moscow area. On May 1st, 1942, 217 divisions operated on the Soviet-German front (German numbers were approximately twice as high as the divisions of the Soviet armed forces) and 20 brigades of the enemy, that is, about 80% of all the land forces of Germany and its allies, as well as three of the five German air fleets. In connection with this fact, the Stavka did not move their troops from the West to the South-West direction.

And whatever may be said, in my opinion, this was the right decision, like the decision to place strategic reserves in the area of Tula, Voronezh, Stalingrad, and Saratov.

More of our energy and resources were focused on the southwest and West. Ultimately, such a distribution of forces led to the defeat of the German, or rather European army, and it was therefore inappropriate to speak about the wrong distribution of our troops by the summer of 1942. It is through this distribution of troops that we had the opportunity in November to gather sufficient strength to defeat the enemy at Stalingrad, and were able to replenish our troops during defensive battles.




While the Germans were engaged in Kerch, the commander of the southwestern front, S.K Timoshenko, came to the Stavka with a proposal to conduct a major offensive at Kharkov, and sent a plan of operations. S.K Timoshenko and N. Khrushchev insisted on the implementation of the plan. Stalin agreed to conduct operations with forces of the southwestern front involving troops of the southern front. In this instance, our intelligence once again performed badly, and Timoshenko did not know that the Germans, on May 18th, had prepared "Operation Fridericus-1" to eliminate the Barvenkovsky protrusion so that the area could be used as a place to concentrate troops for the upcoming attack to the East. 

Hoping for an equal balance of forces and means, which there was in the beginning of the offensive, our troops went into the thick of the forthcoming summer offensive of the German armies. Upon the delivery of the report of the General Staff on 17th May, 1942, Stalin proposed to stop the offensive due to the impact of the Germans from the South. Timoshenko and Khrushchev assured that the situation in the South would be back to normal soon. On May 18th, Stalin again spoke with Timoshenko and again received soothing assurances.



Only in the evening of 18th May did Timoshenko and Khrushchev raise the alarm and began to demand the cessation of the offensive. Stalin was outraged. They demanded an end to the offensive for the same reasons that Stalin had just warned them. At the time, they objected and continued the attack, and on the evening of May 18th, began to speak the words of Stalin on their behalf. After a few hours, Stalin gave permission for the cessation of the offensive on Kharkov, realizing that it was too late.

On May 19th, the impact grouping of our troops advancing on Kharkov was stopped by Timoshenko. As a result of the irresponsible offensive, the three armies in the South and South-Western fronts suffered heavy casualties. The impact troops of the southwestern front were surrounded. Forces from the 32nd army rescued 22,000 people from the encirclement. Part of the soldiers and commanders managed to break through in small groups and go to the eastern bank of the northern Donets.

Timoshenko and Khrushchev should have been prosecuted, but they got off lightly. Stalin took the blame because he was the one who allowed the attack on Kharkov to begin.

In mid-June, the South-Western front, under the blows of the German troops, were twice forced to retreat and withdraw across the river Oskol. The Kharkov battle lasted from the 12th to the 29th of May, 1942. The defeat at Kharkov, and then in Crimea showed that by the summer of 1942 the Germans once again became stronger than us.

As a result, we did not dislodge the Germans from Kharkov, and the Germans pushed us out of the Barvenkovsky protrusion, and we lost an important operational bridgehead on the northern Donets. The troops of the southwestern and southern fronts suffered heavy losses in manpower and equipment. Our historians do not analyse these events, and write that, according to German military command, in the battles at Kharkov the Germans captured 240,000 prisoners.



The analysis shows that the German command never in all of the war told the truth about the number of our prisoners that were captured. And if you believe them, then in 1941 the Germans captured all surviving officers and soldiers of the Red Army. In fact, our army only managed to grind the fresh German division and army coming and going from Europe. England and the United States calmly watched as we bled in the fight. In their favour was the fact that the Germans did not shed any less blood than us, and November 19th, 1942, more so than us.

The number of our soldiers and officers captured in Kharkov is greatly exaggerated. The Germans actually indicate not the number taken prisoner, and their calculations exaggerated the initial number of staff of our armies advancing on Kharkiv. Here the 6th army and task force of the Southwest front, coming from the Barvenkovsky protrusion, and also the 28th army's secondary attack of Kharkov from the district of Volchansk, struck the main blow. Germans included in number of prisoners also the numbers of the 9th army of the Southern front holding the defence from the South near where the 57th army held the defence.

German data is not true, because first of all, not all but part of forces of the three armies were surrounded (according to Vasilevsky and our historians, they were all surrounded by impact troops); secondly, our troops after the German attack for nearly two weeks fought fierce battles and had large losses; thirdly, some of our officers and soldiers came from the environment and therefore the number of Germans taken prisoner by our military may not have exceeded 20,000 people. Thousands of people taken into captivity is a lot.

I think that along with the dead, we lost about 80,000 people in this battle. We must remember that at that time our army had a strength of much (often almost double) below what was authorized. In my opinion, regardless of whether we would keep the defense of the Barvenkovsky protrusion or, as actually happened, we began the offensive on Kharkov, in any case, we would have crumbled and would have left a foothold, because our troops, exhausted from fighting in the offensive that liberated hundreds of thousands of square meters of his native land, was in need of rest, replenishment of men, and ammunition and equipment. After losing the battle of Kharkov, we had lost the bridgehead on the Northern Donets - Barvenkovsky protrusion.

The Supreme command needed larger reserves for planning offensive operations. Therefore, the General Staff did not plan any major offensive operations in the summer of 1942. But against the German forces, surpassing the Red Army by 1.1 million people, we could not hold the defense on the direction of the main attack for long, and were forced to retreat under the threat of encirclement.

It was impossible to compensate for the missing numbers with the number of artillery, aircraft, and other weapons, as evacation operations has only just started to operate at full capacity, and the military industry of Europe was superior to the military industry of the Soviet Union.



And the threat of encirclement was real. "On June 28th, the Nazi group forces of Colonel-General Weichs went on the offensive from the areas East of Kursk. The Nazi command counted on this attack and blows from Volchansk to Voronezh to surround and destroy the troops of the Bryansk front, covering the Voronezh direction, and then turning to the South, with an additional impact near Slavyansk, to destroy the troops of the southwestern and southern fronts, and to open the way to the Volga and the North Caucasus," writes A.M Vasilevsky.

The commanders of these fronts were, respectively, F.I Golikov, S.K Timoshenko, and Malinovsky. In the future, the Bryansk front was divided into two: Bryansk and Voronezh. On 14.07.1942, Lieutenant-General N. F. Vatutin was appointed the commander of the Voronezh front.

During the decision on the choice of the front commander, Vatutin worked as Deputy Chief of the General Staff. All candidates who Vasilevsky, with Vatutin, offered the post of commander of the Voronezh front, Stalin assigned. "All of a sudden Nikolai Fedorovich stood up (says the chief of the General staff A. M. Vasilevsky) and said:

"Comrade Stalin! Assign me as commander of the Voronezh front.

"You?"And Stalin raised his eyebrows.

"I supported Vatutin, although was sorry to let him go from the General Staff."

Stalin paused, looked at me and said:

"Okay. If comrade Vasilevsky agrees with you, I don't mind."

So N.F Vatutin was the commander of the Voronezh, then southwest front, which, subordinated to the main force of our troops, defeated the Germans at Stalingrad.

The problem of the destruction of the three fronts was entrusted to the German group of the "South" armies, which was later divided into two groups of armies: "B", under the command of field Marshal F. Bock, and "A" - under the command of field Marshal V. Liszt. They had distinguished themselves by their atrocities in Yugoslavia and Greece.

The Stavka, if necessary, reinforce the troops of these fronts, and because of this, as well as the skilful actions of the General Staff and the commanders of the Soviet troops, the Germans were unable to achieve their goals in the environment and the destruction of the divisions, corps, and armies of our fronts. Under fighting our troops departed to the East.

This is just how K.K Rokossovsky, on July 5th, 1942, was appointed to his post as commander of the 16th army force commander of the Bryansk front, one of the battles in the Voronezh direction: "On the land where the battles were part of the 5th tank army, the situation was deteriorating: the enemy continued to advance. It was necessary to urgently bring new strength. We decided to push the front line with the reserve 7th armored corps under the command of P.A Rotmistrov.

While at an observation post in the area where the events were unfolding, you could see the whole course of the battle. Flat, open terrain contributed to this. Fighting with our departing units and those who were pressing on their opponent were clearly visible. Enemy tanks could be seen in small groups on a broad front, taking cannon fire, mainly intervalic in nature.

German infantry was moving behind them, lying from time to time and taking continuous automatic fire. In the distance, on the horizon, through the thick clouds of dust, the movement of new columns of tanks and other vehicles were observed.

Our anti-tank artillery quite accurately beat the advancing tanks of the enemy. Where possible it changed positions and immediately opened fire, slowing the enemy advance and covering our departing infantry, which also fought back with machine-gun and mortar fire. The withdrawal had an organized character. But it was obvious that, entering into battle with their main force, approaching from the depths, the enemy will easily crush our units.

However, by this time part of the 7th tank corps arrived. Before our eyes, the corps turned and resolutely marched towards the main tank forces of the enemy, hitting them with all our batteries, including the artillery and tank corps. Particularly effective were the "Katyusha" volleys.

The battlefield was shrouded in clouds of dust. Through them shone a dim flash of gunfire and shell explosions. In many places pillars of black smoke soared from burning enemy vehicles. Our infantry rallied and, together with tanks, rushed to the enemy. The enemy could not resist this fierce and swift attack. After heavy losses, they withdrew.

Enemy aircraft, except for certain aircraft, almost did not participate in combat. Nor did our aircraft. All our attempts to build on the progress in this area did not produce results. But the offensive was repelled. In these battles, the commander of the 5th Panzer army, General Lizyukov, was killed (tank units, aviation, and the Generals went on the attack). He was moving in the combat formation of one of the connections. To inspire tankmen, the general rushed forth in his KV tank, rushed into an arrangement of the opponent and laid down his life." The Germans were rapidly advancing, which was facilitated by the superiority in forces and natural conditions of the region.

On 6th July, 1942, street fighting began for Voronezh, in which Soviet troops held the left side of the city and the bridgehead on the right Bank. Nazi occupiers had driven out all the civilian population of the captured parts of Voronezh, destroyed over 2,000 people, who were executed on the outskirts of the city in Pishchane and more than 500 wounded and sick who were in the city hospital.




     Follow us on Facebook!                                                  
              Facebook                                   

       Follow us on Twitter!
              Twitter               

             Donate!

Sunday, 3 April 2016

Partitions, Coups, and Colonies: A Timeline for the Middle-East

By Ollie Richardson for Fort Russ
3rd April, 2016




Caught between the two poles of ideology that have dominated the last century, Liberalism and Communism, the Middle East has been used as a chessboard to determine the leading ideology for global order. While the United States of America has been involved in war for 93% of its existence, not every conflict has occurred on its soil. In fact, the majority have been fought abroad. The timeline below will attempt to shed some light on some of the chess battles between the two leading ideologies that have taken place in the Middle East since the buildup of World War I. 

While not a definite list, the aim of the timeline is to focus on the countries that are still heavily involved in conflicts in the 21st century. These include: Syria, Libya, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Lebanon, Egypt, and other nations such as Algeria and Tunisia (peripheral to Libya). The timeline excludes countries in the gulf and most of Africa, as they have shown to be merely assets of Western intelligence, usually with western-friendly monarchies or despotic regimes. The aforementioned countries in and around the Levant have sincerely tried to retain sovereignty and independence, but seem to be consistently thwarted in these attempts by Anglo-Atlanticist nations and their proxy forces.

The reader is encouraged to conduct their own research on any of the topics, and to form their own conclusions. 


                                                     ~

  • 1882: British occupation of Egypt
    • In order to prevent the French from taking control of Egypt, the British established their long-term presence in Egypt. This move also served the purpose of protecting the British sea lanes to India, much like the occupation of South Africa.


  • 1901: Mozaffar ad-Din Shah Qajar gives D'Arcy Drilling rights
    • William D'Arcy paid the Shah £20,000 for a 60 year concession on land that covered 480,000 square miles of Persia. ¹


  • 1905: Sidney Reilly steals oil rights in Persia
    • Reilly, disguised as a priest, tracks down William Knox D'Arcy in Persia with the aim of hijacking the contract with the Parisian Rothschild Bank. He succeeded in giving Britain the rights to a major source of oil.
Sidney Reilly

  • 1909: Tel Aviv constructed
    • Built under the British mandate in Palestine, "the city of Tel Aviv was founded in 1909 to the immediate north of the walled port city of Jaffa, on the hills along the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea." ²
"About 100 people participate in a lottery to divide a 12 acre plot of sand dunes, that would later become the city of Tel Aviv." (source)

  • 1915: Gallipoli Campaign
    • The campaign of the Dardanelles that led to a British defeat. After the Ottoman Empire placed on embargo on oil from Baku, the British were unable to secure Russian oil for their war effort.

  • 1916: Sykes-Picot Agreement
    • After the Russian Revolution of 1917, the Bolshevik party discovered a document, made in 1916, to carve up the Ottoman Empire, which they subsequently released to the public. Britain's Mark Sykes and France's Georges Picot had negotiated a deal whereby France and Britain would split the Middle East into Areas A and B. According to the document, the British would get Jordan (today) and the areas east of Iraq and Kuwait. The French would get Syria, Lebanon (today), and Mosul. 


  • 1916: Britain abandons France on the frontline
    • Britain moved over 1 million troops into the eastern front to fight the Ottoman Empire. As if the Sykes-Picot secret agreement wasn't enough of a betrayal for the arabs, who the British claimed to be liberating from Ottoman rule, and Hussein bin Ali, who proclaimed the arab revolt, Britain, in the face of Lawrence of Arabia, promised their arab-allies they would get full independence and sovereignty. This promise was even stated in a letter sent to Hussein bin Ali from Henry McMahon, a British army officer. Lawrence of Arabia would later write in his memoirs³:
"I risked the fraud on my conviction that Arab help was necessary to our cheap and speedy victory in the East and that better we win and break our word than lose."
"Yet the Arab inspiration was our main tool in winning the Eastern war. So I assured them that England kept her word in letter and spirit... but, of course... I was continually bitter and ashamed." 
    • Britain would later stab France in the back in the Treaty in Versailles by establishing the British army's dominance in the Middle East. 
Lawrence of Arabia

  • 1917: Balfour Declaration
    • Arthur James Balfour, on November 2nd, wrote a letter to Walter Rothschild, speaking as a representative of the "English federation of Zionists", where he plants the seed for a Jewish State in Palestine:
Dear Lord Rothschild,
I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.
"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."
I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
Yours sincerely,
Arthur James Balfour
    • This letter would become central to the League of Nations mandate on Palestine, whereby Rothschild's money would fund the emigration of jews who were fleeing Poland and Russia.  


  • 1919: Afghanistan declares independence from Britain
    • Habibullah Khan is assassinated, but his son would declare Afghan sovereignty after gaining the support of tribal leaders. 

  • 1919: Creation of the League of Nations
    • Formed in parallel to the Treaty of Versailles, the League of Nations' role was to ensure the creation of a Jewish Homeland in Palestine. The LoN's 'Mandate for Palestine' gave the green light for jews to settle anywhere in the land of Palestine (between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea).
    • The various articles of the Mandate can be seen here.

  • 1921: Churchill sends 40 experts to Cairo
    • Churchill convened a meeting between Lawrence of Arabia, Percy Cox, and 40 experts near Cairo. The result of this meeting was the creation of the British Colonial Office - Middle East Division, which was "responsible for the administration of all British territories (including protectorates and mandated territories) outside the British Isles except India, Burma and the Persian Gulf sheikhdoms (all of which are administered by the India Office)." ⁴ As a result of this, Mesopotamia was renamed 'Iraq", and the RAF was stationed there.
Colonial Office in London - today it is the Foreign and Commonwealth Office

  • 1923: Britain recognises Transjordan
    • Churchill's notorious 1922 White Paper designated the area east of the Jordan river as somewhere the Jews could not settle. This area was renamed Transjordan and handed over to Abdullah I of Jordan.

  • 1923: Republic of Turkey is founded
    • Mustafa Kemal Atatürk becomes the first President of the Republic of Turkey. Over time he would shape the Republic according to the western paradigm until his death in 1938.

  • 1926: Lebanon becomes semi-independent from France
    • The Lebanese constitution, created on May 23rd, 1926, turned "Lebanon [into] a sovereign, free, and independent country. It is a final homeland for all its citizens. It is unified inits territory, people, and institutions within the boundaries defined in this constitution and recognized internationally." The constitution in its entirety can be seen here

  • 1926: Mosul awarded to Iraq 
    • As Turkey and Britain both desired the possession of Mosul, Britain took the issue to the League of Nations. The LoN declared that Mosul should be a part of Iraq, a decision that was affected by the British dominance of the LoN. 
Mosul Commission (1925), sitting (center): Col. A. Paulis - G. Bell - Sir H. Dobbs - Source: Marc Dassier papers & collection 

  • 1927: Seven Sisters formed
    • Consisting of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, Gulf Oil, Standard Oil of California, Texaco, Royal Dutch Shell, Standard Oil of New Jersey, and Standard Oil Company of New York, the formation of the Seven Sisters signalled the end of British dominance of the global oil trade. The seven companies would agree to fix prices and put an end to the price competition that had dominated the preceding years. 



  • 1928: Red Line Agreement
    • Following the formation of the Seven Sisters, the Red Line Agreement "marked the creation of an oil monopoly, or cartel, of immense influence, spanning a vast territory. The cartel preceded easily by three decades the birth of another cartel, OPEC, which was formed in 1960. Excepting Gulbenkian, the partners were the super majors of today. Within the "red line" was included the entire ex-Ottoman territory in the Middle East, including the Arabian Peninsula (plus Turkey) but excluding Kuwait. Kuwait was excluded, as it was meant to be a preserve for the British. Years later, Walter Teagle of Jersey remarked that the agreement was "a damn bad move.""⁵

  • 1928: Muslim Brotherhood established in Egypt
    • Hassan al-Banna founded the MB as a response to the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire. From there it moved from an underground movement to a mainstream attraction. A focal point of the MB is the disregard of secular values and the sanctioning of Jihad. 
Hassan al-Banna

  • 1932: Iraq recognized as an independent Monarchy by Britain
    • Due to Iraq's accession into the League of Nations, British rule over Iraq ended, as was previously agreed. The country would remain an ally to Britain in the Middle East for the decades to come. 
Residents in Baghdad celebrate their new independence

  • 1936: Palestine protests against the Zionist movement
    • Whilst trying to keep French influence out of the Middle East and protect the Suez Canal, Britain had to contend with Arab revolts in Palestine, which were sparked by the stabbing of two Jews. This resulted in mass riots, a general strike in Jaffa and Nablus, and demands to ban Jewish emigration. 


  • 1937: The Peel partition plan is rejected
    • As a result of the revolt, Britain established the Peel Commission in order to further examine the conflict between Jews and Arabs. The Commission highlighted that the desire of Palestinians for independence and their fear of a Jewish state was the cause of the 1936-39 revolts. Recommendations were made to the British government, including a stemming of the flow of emigrating Jews, but they ultimately rejected it, along with all the Arab nations sans Transjordan. 
Lord Peel arriving in Palestine

  • 1939: Britain publishes MacDonald White Paper
    • Arabs and Jews were summoned to a meeting so that the issues between them could be further discussed. However, the meeting was unsuccessful as the Arab representatives refused to accept the authenticity of the Jewish delegation, and thus Britain had to negotiate with each party individually. The result of these talks was the MacDonald White Paper. The paper highlighted plans to limit Jewish emigration, but the Arab representatives still rejected the policy. 

  • 1941: Britain invades Iraq
    • After Rashid Ali al-Gaylani attempted a coup in 1941, the British removed him from power and reinstated the British-friendly government. The RAF bombed the Iraqi forces until they were defeated in May. 


  • 1941: Britain & Russia occupy Iran

    • Britain managed to persuade Stalin to occupy Iran on the basis that a few German engineers were present on nearby neutral territory. The result of this occupation was thousands of Iranians dying from starvation, epidemics of diseases, and a lack of heating fuel. General Schwarzkopf was sent to Iran to train the Iranian police force for six years.



    • 1942: King Faruq appoints Mustafa al-Nahhas
      • As a result of caving in to British pressure and tanks, the King of Egypt appoints Mustafa al-Nahhas as Prime Minister, an act that sabotaged the reign of Faruq. 
    Mustafa al-Nahhas
    • 1943: Lebanon granted full autonomy by France
      • Charles de Gaulle, after much pressure, declared Lebanon an Independent state, along with the US, Britain, the Soviet Union, and the Arab states. France would later arrest a handful of Lebanese politicians, but would later release them. 
    Lebanese government in 1943

    • 1945: Arab League formed
      • Consisting of Syria, Egypt, Transjordan, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen, the Arab League was formed in Cairo as an attempt to coordinate actions between the Arab states. The Arab League would act as the center for the rejection of a Jewish state in Palestine. 




    • 1946: Democratic party established in Turkey
      • After a split inside the Republican People's Party, the Democratic Party was founded, which ended the single party system. This was however short-lived, as the Democratic Party was later banned in 1956.



    • 1946: Kurdish Democratic Party established in Iraq
      • The KDP was formed in the Soviet occupied Northern Iran under the leadership of Mustafa Barzani. 


    • 1946: Syria gains independence from France
      • After being under the rule of the Ottoman Empire pre WW1, France 'gained' Syria as a result of the aforementioned Sykes-Picot agreement. After years of protests and fighting with the French forces, Syria gained independence shortly after WW2, as France could no longer maintain its influence in the region. 

    • 1948: State of Israel established
      • The British deemed it necessary to keep a large military contingent in Palestine so that they could keep it under their wing. David Ben-Gurion's announcement on the creation of Israel in May 1948 was greeted by Egyptian air raids and clashes between Jews and Arabs. The British mandate over former Palestine had officially ended.
    • 1947: Pakistan created
      • After the rebellion of the Indian Navy in 1946, Louis Mountbatten partitioned the Indian sub-continent into East and West Pakistan, separated by India, and handed power over to Muhammad Ali Jinnah.
    First Pakistani government in 1947

    • 1950: Israel proclaims Jerusalem as its capital
      • The Knesset votes 61-2 in favour of naming Jerusalem as the capital city of Israel. The proclamation stated:
    “Whereas with establishment of the state of Israel, Jerusalem once more becomes the capital; Whereas practical difficulties which caused the Knesset and government institutions to be temporarily housed elsewhere have now for the most part been removed and the government is carrying out the transfer of its institutions to Jerusalem; The Knesset expresses the wish that construction of the seat of the government and Knesset in Jerusalem proceed speedily on the site allotted by the government for this purpose.”⁶

    • 1951: Libya declares independence 
      • After originally being partitioned into 3 regions in 1943 by France and Britain, and occupied by Italy in 1947, the United Nations granted Libya its independence. 

    • 1951: Mohammad Mosaddegh made Prime Minster
      • After years of uncooperative behaviour on behalf of the British, Mosaddegh, as part of the National Front of Iran, used the oil issue as a springboard to win seats in parliament. 
     
    • 1951: AIOC nationalised
      • Because Britain was dissatisfied with their lack of control over the political process in Iran, they sent the Navy to Iran when Mosaddegh nationalised the nation's oil, despite previous guarantees they would not interfere in a private company, despite the fact that over half of the AIOC was owned by the British Monarchy. This would lead to sanctions in banking, and oil shipments, with the RAF and Navy sent to British controlled Iraq. This would lead to a series of court battles, the result of which was the denial of British jurisdiction on the matter. 

    • 1951: Turkey joins NATO
      • As an indicator of the orientation of Turkey towards the West, they, along with Greece, joined the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation in 1951. Turkey would become a US ally in the East, and an important node in the buffer zone against the Soviet Union.  





    • 1952: Gamal Abdel Nasser & Muhammad Naguib lead a movement to oust Farouk
      • Nasser's Free Officers nationalist movement staged a coup to remove Farouk, and replacing him with Naguib. Nasser would replace Naguib in 1954 and survive an assassination attempt.
    Naguib (left) and Nasser (right)
    • 1953: Sudan gains independence from Egypt
      • After the coup in Egypt, Naguib and Britain agreed on Sudan's right to self-determination. Ismail al-Azhari would then eventually lead Sudan to independence in 1956.

    • 1953: Eisenhower rejects Iran aid request
      • Despite being unaware of Eisenhower's plan to remove him, Mossadegh sent him multiple letters asking for financial aid. Eisenhower wrote back in May 1953 explaining how he would need to run the request by John Foster Dulles before giving a concrete answer. He would later decline the request, citing Iran's ownership of its oil as the reason. 

    • 1953: Operation Ajax
      • Norman Schwarzkopf's visit to Iran was the sign of the removal of Mossadegh from power. Allen Dulles, after meeting the US ambassador in Iran, and his brother, John, had convinced Eisenhower that now was the time to stage a coup. With the assistance of the British Secret Service, Mossadegh was arrested in August 1953, with Reza Shah Pahlavi being his western-backed replacement. For the Anglo control of Iranian oil - it was back to business.

    • 1954: Lavon Affair
      • Israel conducts a false flag in Egypt; they would bomb American and British-owned targets, and try to pin the blame on Egypt. One of the bomber's explosive device prematurely detonated, setting him on fire. Israeli Defense Minister Pinhas Lavon resigns after being falsely accused of being involved; his signature on an incriminating document had been forged by an Israeli spy network involving Binyamin Gibli. As a result of this, the soviets build the Aswan Dam, and in 1956 Nasser becomes President. Israeli, with Britain and France, would later bomb the Sinai peninsula in 1956, forcing the closure of the Suez Canal. Colonel Mustafa Hafez, head of intelligence in Gaza, is assassinated by an Israeli letter bomb in 1956.
    Moshe Dayan (left), Lavon (right) and Shimon Peres behind them
    • 1956: Tunisia declares its independence from France
      • After gaining independence in March of 1956, the monarchy was abolished and the Republic of Tunisia declared. Habib Bourguiba would become the President, Prime Minister, and Head of State.


    • 1956: UNEF stationed in Sinai
      • After the US withdrew their financing for the Aswan Dam, Nasser announced the nationalisation of the Suez Canal Company. UN 'peacekeepers' (United Nations Emergency Force) were then sent to Egypt for 12 months. After they left, Israel violated Egyptian sovereignty once again. Russian satellites would disprove Israel's excuse that Egypt was amassing troops on the border.

    • 1958: NUMEC, Apollo Industries founded
      • Israel begins to construct its illegal nuclear programme by diverting materiel to Tel Aviv.
    "Beginning in the 1960s, NUMEC received 25 tons of government-owned weapons-grade uranium to process into nuclear fuel for the US Navy and top-secret programs such as nuclear rockets and satellite fuel. NUMEC “lost” more HEU than any government contractor, leading to ongoing FBI, CIA and NSA investigations into whether the plant’s owners had collaborated with Israeli intelligence operatives and nuclear weapons development experts who frequented the plant.
    According to a Department of Energy report in 2001, the now-shuttered NUMEC now holds the dubious record of "losing" more weapons-grade uranium (PDF) than any other US processing facility. Although CIA officials such as former Tel Aviv Station Chief John Hadden publicly claimed NUMEC was “an Israeli operation from the start,” American presidents from LBJ to Obama successfully quashed all public requests for release of thousands of pages of NUMEC-related top-secret government documents. Official US treatment of NUMEC as a pollution issue, rather than a crime scene and challenge to governance, has punished direct victims sickened by the shoddy smuggling-front’s operations." ⁷

    • 1958: United Arab Republic established
      • Starting out as a union between Egypt and Syria, the UAR were merged into a single unit with Nasser as head. As a result, both Egypt and Syria declared their 'arabness' and scrapped native citizenship. With the addition of North Yemen in 1958, it was then called the United Arab States. In 1961, however, Syria left the union after a military coup by Abd al-Karim al-Nahlawi. 
    • 1960: OPEC formed
      • Founding members Saudi Arabia, Iran, Kuwait, Iraq, and Venezuela would be later joined by Indonesia, Libya, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Nigeria, and Algeria. Their objective would be "to coordinate and unify petroleum policies among the member countries to secure fair and stable prices for petroleum producers, an efficient economic and regular supply of petroleum to consuming nations and a fair return on capital to those investing in the industry." ⁸

    • 1962: Algeria fights the French for their independence
      • After 5 years of guerrilla warfare versus the French, Charles de Gaulle declared Algeria's right to independence. After a further 4 years of conflict, an agreement was signed in 1962.

    • 1962: DOJ orders AZC to register as a foreign lobby
      • The US Department of Justice, under Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, ordered the American Zionist Council to register as an official foreign lobby (Foreign Agents Registration Act). 

    • 1963: AIPAC infiltrates Washington DC
      • The American Zionist Council transfers its activity to its parent organisation - the Amercian-Israel Public Affairs Committee.

    • 1963: David Ben-Gurion informed by JFK that Israel's possession of nuclear weapons won't be tolerated
      • JFK would then demand an inspection at the Dimona nuclear plant in South Israel, which  Gurion would ignore:
    Dear Mr. Prime Minister,
    I welcome your letter of May 12 and am giving it careful study. 
    Meanwhile, I have received from Ambassador Barbour a report of his conversation with you on May 14 regarding the arrangements for visiting the Dimona reactor. I should like to add some personal comments on that subject. 
    I am sure you will agree that there is no more urgent business for the whole world than the control of nuclear weapons. We both recognized this when we talked together two years ago, and I emphasized it again when I met with Mrs. Meir just after Christmas. The dangers in the proliferation of national nuclear weapons systems are so obvious that I am sure I need not repeat them here. 
    It is because of our preoccupation with this problem that my Government has sought to arrange with you for periodic visits to Dimona. When we spoke together in May 1961 you said that we might make whatever use we wished of the information resulting from the first visit of American scientists to Dimona and that you would agree to further visits by neutrals as well. I had assumed from Mrs. Meir's comment that there would be no problem between us on this. 
    We are concerned with the disturbing effects on world stability which would accompany the development of a nuclear weapons capability by Israel. I cannot imagine that the Arabs would refrain from turning to the Soviet Union for assistance if Israel were to develop a nuclear weapons capability - with all the consequences this would hold. But the problem is much larger than its impact on the Middle East. Development of a nuclear weapons capability by Israel would almost certainly lead other larger countries, that have so far refrained from such development, to feel that they must follow suit. 
    As I made clear in my press conference of May 8, we have a deep commitment to the security of Israel. In addition this country supports Israel in a wide variety of other ways which are well known to both of us. [4-1/2 lines of source text not declassified] 
    I can well appreciate your concern for developments in the UAR. But I see no present or imminent nuclear threat to Israel from there. I am assured that our intelligence on this question is good and that the Egyptians do not presently have any installation comparable to Dimona, nor any facilities potentially capable of nuclear weapons production. But, of course, if you have information that would support a contrary conclusion, I should like to receive it from you through Ambassador Barbour. We have the capacity to check it. 
    I trust this message will convey the sense of urgency and the perspective in which I view your Government's early assent to the proposal first put to you by Ambassador Barbour on April 2. 
    Sincerely, 
    John F. Kennedy


    • 1963: JFK assassinated
      • After months of chasing the Israeli foreign lobbies, JFK would be assassinated, with the blame being placed on Lee Harvey Oswald. His Brother, Robert Kennedy, would also be assassinated in 1968, which was pinned on a Palestinian.

    • 1964: Palestine Liberation Organization formed
      • In order to bring the different Palestinian factions together under an umbrella organisation, the PLO was formed in 1964. The theme of the Palestine National Council's charter would focus on the destruction of the state of Israel and the occupation in general.
    Malcolm X with the PLO in 1964
    • 1967: The Six Day War
      • With Lyndon B. Johnson in office, UNAF would leave the Egypt-Israel border, giving the green light for Israel to bomb the Egyptian Army, under the cover of the previously used excuse - a build-up of troops. A US intelligence ship was in the vicinity - USS Liberty - which Israel attacked also, citing "an identification error". Israel would subsequently annex the Golan Heights, the Gaza strip, the West Bank, and the Sinai Peninsula. 


    • 1970: Kurds gain autonomy in Iraq
      • After revolting against the Ba'ath party's rise to power in 1968, the Kurds (led by Mulla Mustafa Barzani) would reach an agreement with the Iraqi government, the result of which was the creation of an autonomous region.
    Mulla Mustafa Barzani (left) with Saddam Hussain (right)

    • 1970: Gamal Abdel Nasser dies
      • Muhammad Anwar El Sadat would become Nasser's successor, who would receive the support of the Muslim Brotherhood. The US would use the Muslim Brotherhood as a buffer against the Soviets, which would result in a boomerang effect of anti-western nationalism.
    • 1972: Munich Olympics massacre
      • A Black September organisation would kill 11 Israeli athletes, resulting in retaliation from Israel against the PLO. Later, in 1973, in what is known as Operation Wrath of God/Operation Spring Youth, the IDF raided Lebanon and murdered 3 prominent PLO leaders and dozens of others. The pretext for such an attack was the Munich massacre.

    • 1972: Iraq and Soviet Union sign Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation
      • The Baath Party developed their relations with the Soviet Union as a result of their support for the Arabs in the preceding wars with Israel. This development resulted in the signing of a cooperation treaty based on a "respect for sovereignty, territorial integrity, and non-interference in one another's internal affairs".

    • 1973: Yom Kippur War
      • Named after the occurrence on the Jewish Holiday of Yom Kippur, Egypt and Syria exact revenge on Israel and recapture the land that was previous stolen from them. The UN had previously demanded that Israel give back the land they annexed, but they ignored all requests. Egypt complied with the UN resolution and left occupied Palestine,  but Israel used this opportunity to build more settlements, again, ignoring the UN. Eventually the UN would demand a ceasefire in the form of resolution 338. 
     
    • 1975: Iran & Iraq end border dispute
      • The Algiers agreement would entail:
    "First: Carry out a final delineation of their land boundaries in accordance with the Constantinople Protocol of 1913 and the Proceedings of the Border Delimitation Commission of 1914.
    Second: Demarcate their river boundaries according to the thalweg line.
    Third: Accordingly, the two parties shall restore security and mutual confidence along their joint borders. They shall also commit themselves to carry out a strict and effective observation of their joint borders so as to put an end to all infiltrations of a subversive nature wherever they may come from. 
    Fourth: The two parties have also agreed to consider the aforesaid arrangements as inseparable elements of a comprehensive solution. Consequently, any infringement of one of its components shall naturally contradict the spirit of the Algiers Accord. The two parties shall remain in constant contact with President Houari Boumedienne who shall provide, when necessary, Algeria's brotherly assistance whenever needed in order to apply these resolutions." ⁹


    • 1978: Camp David Accords
      • Officially signed in 1979 between Menachem Begin and Anwar al-Sadat, the accords would demand that Israel give the Sinai peninsula back to Egypt, as well as negotiations on Israeli-Palestinian co-existence (with the latter never coming into fruition).

    • 1979: Iranian revolution
      • After being exiled in Turkey since 1964, Ayatollah Khomeini would returned to replace Reza Shah Pahlavi and declare the Islamic Republic of Iran. 

    • 1979: Saddam Hussain installed as President
      • After being in exile in Egypt after a failed coup attempt, the CIA would being back Saddam and make him the President of Iraq.
    • 1979: Ayatollah Khomeini nationalises Iranian oil
      • After the revolution, Iran's international oil agreements were cancelled, and National Iranian Oil Company took control of the Republics resources. 

    • 1979: Iran hostage crisis
      • After Reza Shah Pahlavi was ousted from Iran, a crowd decided to blockade the US embassy, with over 90 people taken hostage. After multiple botched rescue attempts, the seizure eventually ended with 8 casualties among those taken hostage. 

    • 1979: Soviet Union enters Afghanistan
      • At the height of the cold war, Soviet troops entered Afghanistan in the middle of a civil war. The Soviets wanted to retain the leadership of Hafizullah Amin, and the US wanted to arm and fund the Mujahdeen to retain western influence in the region. The Soviets would replace Amin with Babrak Karmal. The US would arm the Mujahdeen, headed by Osama bin Laden, with stingers, which would ultimately result in the Soviets' retreat. 

    • 1980: Iran-Iraq war
      • After installing Saddam Hussain as a puppet leader, Ronald Reagan armed and encouraged him to attack Iran. The failed Operation Eagle Claw, the operation to rescue those who had been taken hostage at the US embassy in Tehran, would lead to an attempted Coup using Saddam and remnants of the old Iranian government. Several military officials were executed as a result of this for suspected treason. Reza Shah Pahlavi was leaking information to Saddam on the capabilities of the Iranian army and the general state of the country under US sanctions. 
      • After Iraq attacked Iran and conquered many towns, the Iranian army managed to fight back and put Saddam on the brink of defeat. The CIA, watching on the sidelines, decided to help Saddam regain the upper hand in the war by offering him political, military, economic, and logistical support. 
      • In 1981, the hostages at the US embassy were released, known as the 'October surprise'.
        • These events would run parallel with the Iran-contra affair; the CIA arm Iran, using Israel as a proxy, to attack Saddam Hussain, who was given chemical weapons by Donald Rumsfeld in 1986.





      • 1981: Anwar Sadat assassinated
        • Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman was not only accused of being involved in the assassination of Sadat, but he would later be accused of being the mastermind behind the 1993 World Trade Center bombings. 

      • 1981: Israel annexes the Golan Heights
        • After capturing the Golan heights by force in 1967, Israel would then annex the territory after Menachem Begin would get 63 'yes' votes to 21 'no' votes in Parliament. The Syrian  government treated it as an act of war, and the White House highlighted the incompatibility of the annexation with the Camp David Accords. 

      • 1981: Operation Opera
        • Israel bombs the Osirak Nuclear Research Facility near Baghdad , citing the following as justification:
      "...the reactor was about to go into operation and was a threat to Israel because it could produce nuclear weapons. Begin's claims were contradicted by a number of experts, but there was considerable circumstantial evidence that Iraq indeed hoped eventually to develop a nuclear weapon." ¹⁰

      • 1982: Israel invades Lebanon
        • Israel would pound Beirut in order to remove the PLO's presence from the capital. Hezbollah is then established in retaliation to Israel's occupation of southern Lebanon. According to Menachem Begin, Jews would be subject to another Treblinka if they did not attack Lebanon. ¹¹

      • 1982: Oded Yinon Plan published
        • Oded Yinon's paper would build on the foundations of Zionism laid by Theodore Herzl at the 1897 First Zionist Congress in Basle. Below are two quotes from the document, which can be seen here:

      "Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shiite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north." 


      "The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unqiue areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel’s primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shiite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern neighbor, and the Druzes who will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in northern Jordan."



      • 1982: Muslim Brotherhood movement clashes with Syrian Army
        • Hama becomes the scene of massacre at the hands of the Muslim Brotherhood, who's rebellion would be quelled by Hafez al-Assad. The world media would use this incident to demonize both the Soviets and Assad: "...be one of the bloodiest regimes in the Middle East, shaken from fear of espionage and with pro-soviet declarations and refusal of any peace policy overbidding itself every day anew." ¹²

      • 1986: Reagan bombs Libya
        • The US would justify the bombings of Tripoli by accusing Libya of being involved in the La Belle discotheque attack in West Berlin.


        • 1987: Israeli spy Jonathan Jay Pollard sentenced to life imprisonment
          • Pollard was arrested for Israeli espionage in 1985, and the media, at Washington's request, would censor any form of detailed discussion on the case. He would later be released 30 years after his arrest as a goodwill gesture after the Iran Nuclear Deal was passed. 

        • 1987: Palestinian intifada
          • A Palestinian uprising begins after 4 civilians are killed by an Israeli jeep at a Gaza checkpoint. Another civilian is also killed in the resulting protest by gunfire. 

        • 1988: Lockerbie bombing
          • Pan Am Flight 103 from London to New York suffers an explosion onboard whilst over Scotland. All 243 passengers were killed. The blame was pinned on Libyan Abdelbaset al-Megrahi (photoed below), who was allegedly a Libyan Intelligence Officer.

        • 1989: Osama Bin Laden leads Al-Qaeda
          • Tracing back to the emergence of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, the CIA would choose Bin Laden to front Al-Qaeda in order to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan. As time went on, Al-Qaeda would only grow in size and strength, establishing local branches all over the Middle East.

        • 1990: Gulf War
          • The daughter of the Ambassador of Kuwait, Saud bin Nasser Al-Sabah, would give a fraudulent testimony that had been prepared for her by the PR firm Hill & Knowlton. In 1991, the US airforce would begin its bombardment on Iraqi troops in Kuwait.

        • 1991: Madrid Peace Conference
          • Syria, Lebanon, Israel, and Jordan, along with the Palestinians, would meet to discuss the issue of occupation. The Israelis refused to negotiate with the PLO, so instead regular citizens from the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip were included in the talks. The Madrid talks would soon be replaced by the Oslo Accords.

        • 1992: Defense Planning Guidance released
          • Paul Wolfowitz would published the DPG policy papers, which outlined a vision for the future of the US in the Cold War. Dick Cheney had to rewrite the papers after the mainstream media leaked the original classified versions. 

        "In the Middle East and Persian Gulf, we seek to foster regional stability, deter aggression against our friends and interests in the region, protect U.S. nationals and property, and safeguard our access to international air and seaways and to the region's oil. The United States is committed to the security of Israel and to maintaining the qualitative edge that is critical to Israel's security. Israel's confidence in its security and U.S.-Israel strategic cooperation contribute to the stability of the entire region, as demonstrated once again during the Persian Gulf War. At the same time, our assistance to our Arab friends to defend themselves against aggression also strengthens security throughout the region, including for Israel." ¹³


        • 1993: World Trade Center bombing
          • The blame for the bombings would be pinned on the Egyptian El Sayyid Nosair, who was also accused for murdering Meir David Kahane, an American-Israeli Rabbi and activist for the Jewish Defense League. 

        • 1995: US places sanctions on Iran
          • Bill Clinton places further sanctions on Iran, accusing them of developing Weapons of Mass Destruction. He banned all American firms from investing in Iran and its Oil industry. 

        • 1996A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm published
          • The paper would detail how Israel should develop relations with Jordan and Turkey in order to contain any perceived threats, the promotion of 'self-defense' against the Palestinians, and the termination of US aid to develop Israel's economic stability. Neoconservative contributor Douglas Feith was quick to distance himself from the papers:

          "I have been frequently been cited, online and in print, as a "co-author" of the "Clean Break" paper, an essay which some writers have described as a neoconservative "manifesto" or "master plan."
          These claims are false.
          I was not a co-author of the "Clean Break" paper. I neither wrote it nor signed it. I do not believe I even saw it before it was published. The paper was published by an organization with which I had no affiliation. The paper did not have co-authors.
          An Israeli think tank, The Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS), published "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" in 1996. It is a short paper - approximately 2800 words - that offered thoughts on Israeli and U.S. policies on national security and economics.
          The paper's principal author was David Wurmser (then affiliated with IASPS). As he researched the paper, he shared some of his thoughts with a half dozen people, including me, and asked us for our reactions and our own ideas. When IASPS published the paper, it described these individuals as a "study group." The paper says its "main substantive ideas" came from talks in which the study group members participated.
          In fact, my relationship to the paper is like that of an individual mentioned on a book's acknowledgement page - simply someone with whom the author consulted in the course of his work. It would be foolish to describe all the names on a book's acknowledgement page as co-authors. And it is foolish to describe me as co-author of the "Clean Break" paper.
          I recall that my main contribution to the paper was the suggestion that Israel could help both itself and the United States by "graduating" from the U.S. economic aid program. The paper drew on that suggestion. It said that the Israeli Prime Minister could "use his forthcoming visit to announce that Israel is now mature enough to cut itself free immediately from at least U.S. economic aid and loan guarantees at least, which prevent economic reform."
          The "Clean Break" paper has become grist for thousands of conspiracy-mongering books and articles. If one puts "Clean Break" and "Feith" into the Google search engine, it produces many thousands of hits. Inaccurate references to the "Clean Break" paper have often been used to make the false and vicious argument that I supported war against Iraq to serve Israel's interests rather than America's. After an article in the Washington Post misreported me as a coauthor of the "Clean Break" paper, the Post published a letter from me correcting the point."¹⁴
                                        • Shortly afterwards, in 1997, the think tank Project for the New American Century would release its papers, which stress the creation of Pax Americana. Many of the papers have been removed from the now defunct official PNAC website, but here is such an example from 2000.

                                      • 1998: Radio Free Europe-Radio Liberty launched in Iraq & Iran
                                      "Radio Free Iraq was created by RFE/RL in 1998, in response to direction from the U.S. Congress. Led first by former U.S. Ambassador to Iraq David Newton, and since 2004 by journalist Sergei Danilochkin, it has provided accurate and non-sectarian news and information to local audiences and fostered informed debate of issues that are not otherwise reported in Iraq’s ethnically, politically and religiously fragmented media."

                                      • 2001: Tony Blair and George W. Bush give the green light to bomb Baghdad
                                        • The US and UK would launch long range missiles at the capital of Iraq - Baghdad. They would also declare two-thirds of Iraq as a no-fly zone, giving them a pretext to bomb civilians mercilessly. 
                                        • Previously, William Scott Ritter, a United Nations weapons inspector in Iraq, resigned in 1997 in order to publicly reveal that Iraq did not in fact have any Weapons of Mass Destruction.

                                      • 2001: September 11th attacks
                                        • Two planes would hit the Twin Towers in New York, with a third hitting the Pentagon. The attacks were pinned on 19 alleged Al-Qaeda members, and were used to justify the illegal invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan. As a result of the Iraq invasion, over 1,000,000 Iraqi's would lose their lives; Saddam Hussain is captured, convicted of war crimes, and subsequently executed. The justification for the invasion of Iraq was an alleged meeting in Prague between one of the 9/11 hijackers, Mohammed Atta and a senior Iraqi official, where an alleged transfer of Anthrax took place. Hussein was accused of building Mobile Weapons Labs by the Weekly Standard newspaper, and obtaining Yellowcake Uranium from Niger (the documents had a forged signature).



                                      • 2006: US sends ships to Iran
                                        • In an attempt to intimidate Iran and reinforce the UN sanctions, the US sends 2 aircraft carriers "within sailing" distance to Iran.¹⁵



                                      • 2008: Israel breaks truce with Hamas
                                        • After a 4-month ceasefire, Israel kills 6 Palestinians in a raid who were accused being Hamas terrorists. Hamas, in response, launched 35 rockets into Israel, although no casualties were reported. 

                                      • 2011: Mubarak resigns
                                        • Muhammad Hosni El Sayed Mubarak's time as the President of Egypt comes to an end. The US would put pressure on the Egyptian authorities to release dissidents so that they could participate in a colour revolution. Mubarak's successor, Mohamed Morsi, would be overthrown and tried for ordering the torture and arrest of dissidents. Other leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood were also arrested and tried. Abdel Fattah el-Sisi would become the President of Egypt.

                                      • 2011: US (NATO) bombs Libya
                                        • Ansar al-Sharia and Khalifa Haftar would be bought off by the CIA, and a no fly zone imposed on Libya by the UN. As a result, Muammar Muhammad Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi is captured and executed in the street by 'Libyan Rebels'. The country would turn into a failed state, and a breeding ground for Salafi/Wahhabi terrorism. 

                                      • 2014: US bombs Syria
                                        • After Libya is converted into a failed state, Syria would fall victim to the wave of terrorism that now engulfed the region. Islamic State in Iraq (a product of the US invasion) would spread across the border into Syria, and form alliances that would result in the creation of Jabhat al-Nusra. The US-backed Free Syrian Army would get the ball rolling to overthrow President Bashar al-Assad. In 2013, a Sarin Gas attack was staged by the FSA using gas that the Saudis had smuggled into northern Syria via Turkey. Despite repeated calls for a no fly zone, the US could not get the support they needed from Europe, thus, the use of proxy forces became more intense.  On September 30th, 2015, Russia, at the request of Assad, would enter the conflict in order to help push the Turkish proxies in the north away from Damascus. 


                                      "Remembering history is to open up to the future, forgetting history is a betrayal"    ~  Ji Xinping
                                                         

                                      ____________________________________________________________

                                      1. Katusa, M. The Colder War: How the Global Energy Trade Slipped from America's Grasp, 2014.
                                      2. http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1096
                                      3. Documents on British Foreign Policy, 1919–1939.’ First series. Vol. iv. pp. 245–47.
                                      4. http://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/~lysic/1920s/colonialoffice.htm
                                      5. https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/185/40550.html
                                      6. http://www.jta.org/1950/01/25/archive/knesset-proclaims-jerusalem-as-israels-capital-mapam-and- herut-abstain-from-voting
                                      7. http://antiwar.com/blog/2013/06/27/obamas-numec-nuclear-diversion-cover-up/
                                      8. http://www.opec.org/opec_web/static_files_project/media/downloads/publications/OPECLTS.pdf
                                      9. http://www.mideastweb.org/algiersaccord.htm
                                      10. Spector, Nuclear Proliferation Today, pp. 167-75; George Lardner Jr., and R. Jeffrey Smith, Washington Post, 12/16/92. Also see Elaine Sciolino, New York Times, 11/30/92; Jack Anderson and Michael Binstein, Op-ed, "Iran's Nuclear Ambitions," Washington Post, 12/20/92.
                                      11. Cromer, G. A War of Words: Political Violence and Public Debate in Israel. 2004.
                                      12. Ranke, P.M., Nur noch mit Gewalt, Die Welt, 12.2.1982
                                      13. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfowitz_Doctrine
                                      14. http://www.dougfeith.com/cleanbreak.html
                                      15. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/21/world/middleeast/21navy.html



                                           Follow us on Facebook!                                                  
                                                    Facebook                                   

                                             Follow us on Twitter!
                                                    Twitter               

                                                   Donate!